Eliminating Director's Aberrant Behaviour

Talent SM&RT Behaviour Analysis - A Just In Time Critical Business Intervention

For any ambitious, rapidly-growing company, inevitable growing pains are mitigated by the stewardship of a dedicated and coherent senior management team.

Few occasions challenge the full breadth of a company more than when it prepares to go public with an Initial Public Offering (IPO). During this time of intense scrutiny, leaders must ensure that everyone is pulling in the same direction.

Discover how we used Talent SM&RT as a behaviour analysis tool to fix the “inexplicably aberrant behaviour” of one Director at a critical time for a biotech company preparing for its IPO.

Video content coming soon

Overview of Client & Context

The Head of HR and CEO of a biotechnology company explain that one of their Directors recently began behaving in an increasingly obstructive manner. The CEO is unsure of the reason for this behavior and describes it as “inexplicably aberrant.”

The Director is responsible for a critical business function, for which he holds certain legal responsibilities for licensed products. The role is notoriously difficult to recruit for, and even if it were possible to replace the Director, the loss of product knowledge would be a significant setback for the company.

With the company ramping up in preparation for its IPO, the timing could not be worse, and some form of intervention is essential.

Demographics

SECTOR: Biotech/Pharma/Life Sciences, Manufacturing
COMPANY SIZE: Fast Growth Start Up, Medium Entity
CLIENT CONTACTS: Head Of HR, CEO

Scope & duration

SCOPE: Behaviour Change, Structural Change
PROJECT DURATION: 2 weeks

Project Features

Approach & Processes

During a discovery meeting with the CEO and Head of HR, the scope, nature, and contexts in which the issue presented itself were elicited. The high degree of urgency was also determined.

Talent SMART Actions

      Performance Solutions: Talent SM&RT Behavioural Analysis

      1.   To determine a behavioural solution, it was necessary to profile the Director. Behaviours occur in context, and the biggest variable in a context is usually the people. Therefore, it was also necessary to profile the rest of the senior leadership team that made up that context. This allowed the HR team to frame the profiling as a development process and avoid unfairly scrutinizing one employee.

      2.   The profiling exercise included the Director and senior management-level staff. A profile can be elicited in a 30 to 40-minute session by the profiler. The process was scheduled and completed in under two weeks.

      3.   A team analysis was prepared, but the attitudinal and motivational traits driving the 'aberrant' behaviour were immediately apparent in the Director's profile.

      4.   Because the profiles were conducted in person and conversationally, it was possible to explore the patterns in some detail. The language from the Director indicated several stronger than average driver patterns but also pointed towards a novel solution.

      5.   In a follow-up meeting with the CEO and Head of HR, how the Director's profile clearly explained his behaviour was discussed along with the novel potential solution.

      Results

      Notable Highlights

      Conclusions

      Difficulty in identifying the root cause: It can be challenging to identify the underlying cause of the employee's destructive behaviour, which makes it difficult to develop an effective solution.

      Resistance to change: The employee may be resistant to changing their behaviour, which can make it difficult to implement any solutions.

      Fear of losing a valuable employee: The company may be hesitant to take action against the employee because they are a valuable member of the team, which can make it difficult to take action.

      Lack of communication: If the employee is not properly informed about the impact of their behaviour on the company, they may be less likely to change their behaviour.

      Limited resources: The company may not have the necessary resources to implement effective solutions to address the employee's behaviour.

      Legal and Compliance: Company must consider the legal and compliance issues that may arise from taking action against the employee.

      Impact on the team: The employee's behaviour may be impacting the team and the company culture, which can make it difficult to change the employee's behaviour without addressing the broader issues.

      Complexity of the problem: Biotechnology is a complex field and the employee may have specialized knowledge that is essential for the company, which can make it difficult to find a replacement if the employee is terminated.

      There are several key take-aways from this case study worth considering:

      1. Behaviour change can be very difficult: even for willing individuals and even more so for employers that manage those individuals. Those challenges are exaccerbated when the employee in question is a senior figure with a large degree of functional autonomy.
      2. Behaviours are driven by intentions. In a therapeutic intervention behavioural changes will often fail if a replacement behaviour does not uphold the underlying intention. So in considering what will motivate change it's first important to understand those underlying intentions and how new behaviours must be congruent with them if they are to stick.
      3. Behaviours are context dependent - in fact the "aberrant behaviour" surfaced when new legal responsibilities came to bear ie. the context of the employees role had changed. Equally, context changes can be deliberately applied - in this instance reframing the relationship between an employer and employee to that of client and consultant transformed the context and the "aberrant behaviour" vanished.
      4. This is not a generic fix. Obviously in practical terms this was more than a perceptual reframe, it involved a change to the legal relationship between employer and employee. And for those reasons this is not a generic fix but complex behavioural challenges rarely yield to generic fixes.

      Free Consultation

      A free consultation is an opportunity to discuss your talent objectives and gain a free professional perspective outside of the context of a sales meeting. We do not use consultations as a selling opportunity - but, naturally, we discuss our methods in deploying talent solutions when making suggestions to you. Our approach is to try and advise what people can reasonably expect to achieve themselves with the resources they have and what extra they should expect when engaging a consultancy - whether us or someone else.

      The context of the discussion is entirely up to you - maybe you have a current objective, or want more detail on a case study. In this form we ask for a small amount of detail and depending on what you state may ask for more prior to the consultation - if we feel it will be helpful.

      The consultation can be conducted via telephone or MS Teams etc. depending on your preferences. The duration is up to one hour and we follow up with an email outlining any suggestions and links to resources etc. If you wish to continue please click the 'Next' button below. The form should take no more than 1 - 2 mins to complete.

      Please provide your details below:
      Which of the contexts below are relevant to your talent objectives?

      What 3 words or concepts best describe what is most important to you about your talent objectives? eg. Urgency, Finding Candidates, Simplicity etc.

      Please suggest two dates with a time that you are available - or leave blank and we'll respond with suggestions. If you have time constraints eg. only have 30 mins please indicate in the box below.

      Finally, please indicate whether any colleagues will be attending with you - we don't need any personal identifiers, just their job titles/department functions will be useful.

      Please enter any questions or comments below before sending the form.